RETURN TO MAIN SITE

Viva Mexico!

December 10th, 2008 by Glasgow Film Festival

www.glasgowfilmfestival.org.uk


Y Tu Mama Tambien

Once upon a time Mexican cinema barely registered on the world’s radar even in the 1950s when the country was making around 150 features each year. Spanish exile Luis Bunuel made waves with his Mexican work, especially Los Olvidados (The Young And The Damned) (1950), Ensayo d un Crimen(The Criminal Life Of Archibaldo de la Cruz) (1955) and Nazarin (1958). Down the years, occasional films did break out and gain attention like Jaime Humberto Hermosillo’s gay charmer Dona Herlinda y su Hijo (Dona Herlinda and Her Son)(1986), Alfonso Arau’s smash hit romance Como Agua para Chocolate (Like Water For Chocolate) (1991) or Arturo Ripstein’s gaudy, mesmerising melodrama Profundo Carmesi (Deep Crimson) (1996). If you have had the chance to see any of these titles it will have been at the Glasgow Film Theatre.

Then in 2000 along came Amores Perros (Love’s A Bitch) and Mexican cinema became impossible to ignore. Amores Perros was a thrilling calling card for all that was dynamic and exciting in a new wave of Mexican talent that includes actors Gael Garcia Bernal and Diego Luna, screenwriter Guillermo Arriaga, and such visionary filmmakers as Alfonso Cuaron, Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu and Guillermo Del Toro.

This year the Glasgow Film Festival will focus on the brightest and the best of the Mexican filmmakers set to follow in the footsteps of Cuaron and Del Toro. Supported by the Instituto Mexicano de Cinematografia/Mexican Film Institute (a big thanks to Pablo Briseno Galvan and Alejandro Diaz San Vicente) we will screen a range of features and documentaries that reveal a wealth of talent, ambition and names to mark for the future. The season will include new films from La Zona director Rodrigo Pla and Duck Season director Fernando Eimbcke. Watch out for the full list of films when the GFF programme is launched in January.

Blogger: GFF co-director Allan Hunter

www.glasgowfilmfestival.org.uk

We love her funny face…

December 5th, 2008 by Glasgow Film Festival

www.glasgowfilmfestival.org.uk

You are probably not the first person to ask why Glasgow has chosen Audrey Hepburn as the subject of our 2009 retrospective. There is no special anniversary to celebrate although, had she lived, Audrey would have been 80 in May. There are no sparkling new digital prints of Audrey classics that are waiting to be re-issued although the Festival might just nudge a few distributors to look again at the availability of her work in this country. Co-director Allison Gardner has quite literally gone to the ends of the earth to secure some of the films that we will be showing in February.

We chose Audrey because in an age of shallow celebrity, global uncertainty and economic gloom she remains a shining beacon of elegance, sophistication and everything that makes the movies an irresistible refuge from the daily cares of the world. Given the daily gloom on the news and in the air who wouldn’t want to escape to Audrey’s world for a few hours? An Oscar-winning star and enduring fashion icon, Audrey had the ability to make it all look so effortless. What woman hasn’t wanted to be as chic as Audrey? What man hasn’t wanted to sweep her off her feet, protect and cherish her?

Everyone knows the Audrey Hepburn of Breakfast At Tiffanys. Everyone knows the industry that has grown up around Audrey as her image has adorned everything from handbags to calendars and prints. This is a chance to see what made her so special. A chance to see her best work on the big screen where it belongs.

Of all the great female stars of the 1950s, including Elizabeth Taylor and Grace Kelly, Audrey is the one who remains the most beguiling. The romantic roles in Roman Holiday (1953) and Sabrina (1954) have a tenderness and sincerity that make contemporary romantic comedies look crass and inadequate. Her musicals are simply sublime. The combination of Audrey Hepburn, Fred Astaire, Gershwin tunes and Paris locations makes Funny Face (1957) simply irresistible and the perfect choice for a romantic matinee on St. Valentine’s Day.

There will also be a chance to savour the full range of Audrey’s talent with rare screenings of the undervalued western The Unforgiven (1960) with Burt Lancaster and the once controversial The Children’s Hour (1962) with Shirley MacLaine.

This is a retrospective that salutes the Audrey in all her glory because we will never see her likes again and because we love her funny face, her sunny, funny face…

Blogger: GFF co-director Allan Hunter

www.glasgowfilmfestival.org.uk

Louis Theroux talks to Shooting People about his latest films

December 3rd, 2008 by tamsin@shootingpeople.org

Louis Theroux in Law and Disorder, Sunday 7 December, BBC2, 9pm

Louis Theroux in Law and Disorder, Sunday 7 December, BBC2, 9pm

In a double-parter for BBC2, documentary institution Louis Theroux tags along with law enforcement officers in Philadelphia and Johannesburg - two of the worlds most notorious crime cities.  The film’s soundtrack was scored by Shooting People member Nick Ryan. In the interview below, Shooting People’s Lee Kern speaks to Louis about the shows, his production team and how he has evolved over the years as an interviewer and onscreen persona.

LK: I’ve just seen your film following the Phildelphia police force and am looking forward to seeing the second installment of this double bill which sees you following law and order enforcement officers in another crime hot-spot - Johannesburg.  Were you concerned about the possibility of these films sliding into the grooves, structural rhythms and content cliches of TV cop shows?  From “Cops” to “Police Camera Action” to “Dog the Bounty Hunter” - were you and your crew mindful to give your viewers something different from the time you had on the streets?

LT: I don’t watch a lot of TV cop shows so it wasn’t a case of consciously striving to avoid the cliches. Really it was a matter of trusting to our own instincts. The challenge for us was to walk that line between cops and crooks and to try to understand and empathize with both sides. My prejudice - which may or may not be fair - is that a lot of cop shows would maybe show you the police side but that you’d never get to understand what motivates the dealers and the corner boys to get involved with that lifestyle.

LK: Normally, (I’m assuming), your researchers are out there finding the best and most engaging characters for your films.  You will then have time to prepare a loose strategy in how you are going to engage them and what you want to talk about.  In this film however you are in the back of a police car following real police officers on duty and thus have no control over the characters who come in and out of your film - often for a very short period of time.  Can you describe the different modus operandi this placed upon you as an interviewer?  I would assume you have no researcher’s insight into your characters, no time to “warm them up”, and would need to get down to the nub far quicker than you’ve normally had to?

LT: Right, although the key for us was to start by making sure we were riding with the right officers - that they were go-getting but also somewhat analytical and that they had the intelligence and sensitivity to have an interesting take on the high-crime areas they were policing. Riding around with an officer, it was very natural that we’d start to build up a rapport. It was harder with the guys they were busting. But that was why it was important that a few times - with the corner boys and with Redz the alleged drug lord - we broke off and spoke to them on our own.

Louis Theroux in Law and Disorder

LK: Following from the above, the one time when you did meet a character for a second time - a big, round chap suspected of being a local drugs kingpin, you laid a brilliant, for want of a better word, “trap”, when you lulled him into talking about the price of his jewellery and subsequently put him on the spot over how he was making his money and able to afford such luxuries.  Even he smiled and was unable to field the insinuation you were implying very successfully. Was this a quick-witted piece of genius that you thought up on the spot, or was it something you and your team thought of before you met up for the second time?  The reason why I ask is to try and gain some insight into how many “moves” you keep at the back of your mind before meeting an individual and to also get a sense of the balance you have between a pre-prepared strategy and the kind of spontaneity that any human interaction will ultimately require.

LT: I hadn’t planned on asking about his jewellery. It was just there in front of me and as I was chatting to him I was consciously trying to think of ways to link him to the drug dealing that I’d be reliably informed he was heavily involved in. Obviously he wouldn’t come out and talk openly about it, so I asked about his gold chain instead. What’s interesting about that interview, I think is that I press him several times on his being a drug dealer, and it’s only later, in answer to something else, when he feels less pressured, that he starts talking about being the area leader and he volunteers that he feels that he’s a kind of least bad option for the neighbourhood. He says: “There’s gonna be worser people than me.”

LK: You’re famous for meeting weird indviduals or bizarre personalities, but in this film it seemed that the city itself was a character you were trying to get to grips with.  What I saw of this character was pretty bleak to me. The Philadelphia you showed us was violent, loud and far from being in a unanimous state of mind over what to do about its problems. Is that our future?

LT: I think it’s an extreme version of our present. The “Never snitch” mentality exists in Britain already in certain high crime areas. So does the disconnectedness of a police force whose officers don’t live close to or feel in touch with the areas they police. Whether we’ll head further in that direction, I don’t know. I’m not necessarily pessimistic. While it’s true that there’s a sense of futility and lack of progress in the picture we present of Philadelphia, even there I don’t that it’s getting worse - it just isn’t getting much bettter

LK: How would you say you’ve evolved over the years as an onscreen persona and as an interviewer?  What’s the difference between that young Louis Theroux stepping out for his first Weird Weekend and the Louis Theroux we find now stepping out with the Philadelphia and Johannesburg law enforcement officers?

LT: I’m less concerned with being funny or trying to create humorous situations. I’d rather just tell a good story. I’m also more interested in a bigger picture of how people interrelate - the roles they inhabit, the relationships they form. In the old days, I thought it was all about meeting a fascinating character, but now I’m just as interested in the structures that people work within - institutional, emotional, and so on.

LK: Lots of people have tried to mimic the Louis Formula but they can never do it.  A - because they dont have you, but also because there always seems to be a sheen of excellence that rises above the other films out there.  This scans from the filming itself to the editing and to the music.  Your Philadelphia film was actually scored by Shooting People member, Nick Ryan.  Tell us a little bit about your team.  How much do they heighten or amplify your own onscreen abilities?

Shooter and composer Nick Ryan, who scored the music for Law and Disorder.

Shooter and composer Nick Ryan, who scored the music for Law and Disorder.

LT: Nick was brought in by the editor, Danny Collins. Danny’s always had a knack for finding the right music. In the Weird Weekends days I found a lot of the music myself, but one of the luxuries of working with Danny has been that he usually finds just the right tracks. I’ve always been lucky enough to have a good team around me and in the last two or three years especially so. Nick Mirsky, my exec, also does Wonderland and he did The Armstrongs and he has a great understanding of documentary and of what works for me personally and what doesn’t - he never tries to impose a formula. Emma Cooper is my series producer and she directed and shot the Philadelphia one. Again, good instincts, very hard-working, great at getting the access… We’ve got very talented, very industrious APs. Really, you have to have talented people at every stage - and even then you can still fuck it up.

LK:  Finally, these films see you getting stuck into the world’s mean and dirty danger zones.  What’s going on?  Do you feel you’ve got to compete with Ross Kemp in the tough man stakes now?

LT: There’s always been a slight sense of danger or at least jeopardy in my programmes - at least some of them. So now we’re heading a little further in that direction. It’s part of the growing up process, I think.

WATCH
Louis Theroux: Law and Disorder in Johannesburg
Sunday 07 December
9:00pm - 10:00pm
BBC2

Encounters 08. Back pats all around.

December 2nd, 2008 by James Mullighan

Shooters

A terrific effort from new Encounters Festival Director Liz `Safe Hands’ Harkman, Creative Director Mark `Did You Hear The One About …’ Cosgrove, and team. Encounters `08 was inspiring, popular, fun and beautifully organised.

Shooting People was there in two capacities. First, we sponsor the DepicT! Audience Award. Shooters Luca Paulli and Rebecca Manley won that for their fine `Breaking the Mould’. You can watch it here.

Still from Rebecca and Lucas Breaking the Mould

Still from Rebecca and Luca's Breaking the Mould

Luca and Rebecca win a Life Membership to Shooting People, a copy of our Shorts Book, our Best v Best DVDs, some goodies from the Screenwriters Store including their `Dreams on Spec’ DVD and `Archetypes for Writers’ book, and some BAFTA tickets.

Toe Kristoffersen won the DepicT! Jury Prize (and two grand) for his powerful `Enough’, whilst the irrepressible Michael Davies won the NFTS award for `What’s Virgin Mean?’. NFTS’s Nik `I’m Here All Week’ Powell and I co presented the awards, and he got more laughs than I did. Next time … .

Mullighan, Enoughs producer Sarah Seniors accepting the DepicT! 08 Award on behalf of director Tor Kristoffersen, and NFTS Nik Powell

Mullighan, Enough's producer Sarah Seniors accepting the DepicT! '08 Award on behalf of director Tor Kristoffersen, and NFTS' Nik Powell

Mullighan and Powell with director Michael Davies and producer Sandra Gorel accepting the DepicT! 08 NFTS Special Mention Award.

Mullighan and Powell with director Michael Davies and producer Sandra Gorel accepting the DepicT! '08 NFTS Special Mention Award.

Shooting People also brought a shortened version of its BAFTA co-production Short Sighted to Cinema Three, and much was learned about product placement thanks to Shaun O’Niell from Big Films Group and guests, and the future of digital distribution, thanks to Kate Taylor (London Short Film Festival, Abandon Normal Devices), Digby Lewis (Daily Motion) and Chris Tidman (Shorts International. Read more, and download the free Short Sighted handbook here.

You can read about the other winners here. Make sure you put 17 - 22 November 2009 in your diary, for the next Festival edition.

Mullighan.

A Head Full of Mullighan

November 10th, 2008 by James Mullighan

Ah, good, welcome. (You should scroll down, later, and read all of Cath’s excellent London International Festival bloggings.).

So: Shooting People is media sponsor of Doc/Fest, and I was invited by their suave programmer Hussain Currimbhoy to host a series of Q&As with filmmakers. In between I caught several sessions, grabbed as many films as I could and, occasionally, remembered to eat and breathe.

By Wednesday’s opening day, the Festival was already sold out, with over 1,300 Delegates passes sold. By Thursday evening, more than half had arrived and checked in, a statistic which had Director Heather Croall agog. If it at all strained the Festival’s systems, it didn’t show.

The Gala opening night film was Director / Producer John Dower’s “Thriller in Manila” (which I’d already seen at BRITDOC). http://tinyurl.com/5rqgqf. This bluesy, funny, tense and outright savage film retells, from the point of view of Smokin’ Joe Frazier his brutal and culturally significant third and last fight with Muhammad Ali. The affable Dower gave a frank interview talking, amongst other things, of the pitfalls of making another Muhammad Ali film after the fabulously successful “When We Were Kings”: “ … after all, how many boxing documentaries does the world need?”. John: you can never have enough explorations of this most primeval and nuanced of activities, especially when they cover this much new ground, and so well. More on Iron Mike later.

On Thursday morning, I followed the crowd to a new BBC Storyville production of Elizabeth Stopford’s “I’m Not Dead Yet”. http://tinyurl.com/5frj2f. What starts as a nosy, rather chipper observational about an aging scioness and her two squabbling daughters fast unravels into a deftly handled and broodingly emotional telling of the life-lasting legacies of child abuse. It deftly juxtaposes old family films with recent testimony, and is very poetically shot (why aren’t more docs?). Peering into the never to be healed scars of these three strong, reserved, but somewhat broken women was potently confronting. Further thickening the stew is that Stopford is by turns daughter, niece and grand daughter of the protagonists.

Not too many laughs either at my first Q&A: Lorne Kramer’s “Mee [not a typo] and my Dad” was a very assured medium length short from this UWE student. http://tinyurl.com/62ro7h. Kramer takes a trip to Thailand to videograph the wedding of his father and a local woman (the epnoymous Mee) who was only three years Lorne’s senior. Relations between Kramer and his father had been awkward since the parents divorced, and the film is a frank, sometimes uncomfortable observational about a son who wants a father, and a father who just wants a mate.

An apt emotional lid loosener, then, for Bill Roulston’s “Dream Riders”. http://tinyurl.com/689wko. In a neat flip (a coincidence? I suspect Hussain’s too clever for that), this time son Nico just wants Dad Bill to be a mate, having not trusted him for the last eight years. Bill – a school teacher who’d never made a film before - persuades Nico to accompany him on a cycle trip from the US West Coast to the East. They load up a Winnebago with spares, food and a crew who shoot over 300 hours of footage, and start a long, wary voyage across the continent, and around each other. Initially threatening mawkish therapy rather than film, it ultimately won its audience completely over with a big emotional pay off of reconciliation and retribution. The packed house gave Bill and Nico a warm three minute ovation – the longest I heard in Sheffield. That was too much for them – this was their Festival debut, after all - and arm in arm they dissolved into tears, taking the young lady I had sat next to with them, which then set me off, and the whole audience. Honestly, I’m meant to be a professional.

My, that's a big one.

My, that's a big one

Mid afternoon Saturday, I found myself with 50 minutes to kill, and managed to catch the last half of director Adam Low’s “The Hunt for Moby Dick”, made for Arena, and to accompany Philip Hoare’s eponymous book. http://tinyurl.com/6opnmf. Lingeringly shot, with glutton-satisfying amounts of knuckle-whitening cetacean close ups, sepulchral-toned readings from Herman Mellville’s “Moby Dick”, archive of American whaling operations, and chunks lifted from the classic Holywood take on the story, it is All Things Whale, more than you realised you wanted: a history of the American industry, a socio-cultural analysis of the book, a biography of Melville, a robust economic-historic argument that the industry was the starting block of the American sprint to global capitalist domination, and – less convincingly, but brave – a knitting together of these Leviathans of the deep with human Armageddon and recent geopolitical catastrophes. A moving (again – I am getting soft), and compelling historical document.

Feature debutant New Yorker Astra Taylor’s “Examined Life” is unusual in several senses. http://tinyurl.com/5tqo2t. It’s an exploration of philosophy – uncommon enough – and one which is yet purposefully visual. It’s 80 minutes, in eight chunks. Each is a ten minutes stroll with an actual philosopher, who explicates his/her attitudes. Sounds like film hell, and interest is not just maintained, but actually piqued by Taylor’s Come On In The Water’s Fine gentleness of touch, the often semiotically rich environs in which she has her protagonists walk, and the unpatronising passion those (frighteningly articulate) speakers bring. Taylor also has a simple trick of making the camera occasionally flick off to the side, as if something had caught its / our eye: it worked every time. The ideas contained within the film – and there are dozens upon dozens – take more than a little while to process, and the film has stayed with me for days; it keeps giving. And yes: the Meaning of Life is in there. See it. And even better: I didn’t cry once.

Australian (and newly wed, ahh!) director / producer team Kirsty de Garis and Timothy Jolley in their “Dominic Dunne: After the Party” got terrific and extended access to the author, journalist, sometimes TV personality, and Vanity Fair staple, whilst he followed the last few days of Phil Spector’s first (mis)trial. http://tinyurl.com/5brwny. In a legacy seeking series of interviews, we also get lots of juicy old Hollywood anecdotes, a bottoming out and redemption tale, and many tough nuggets of human tragedy. De Garis shows masterful touch at gaining the trust of this most media savvy of operators, and the whole assured, well organised production is very satisfying.

Prior to the Friday night gala at City Hall, wickedly co-presented by our own Lee Kern, the filmmaker presented his ‘show’ (the quotes are advisable) “Lee Kern’s Jackanories”. http://tinyurl.com/6ptsrw. Not films at all, rather a series of short comic audio documentaries (“I like doing them, because they’re f*cking easy”, Kern explains) with music (Abide With Me, no less!) that essay mental breakdowns. It’s some of the subtlest, leanest wok I’ve seen of Kern’s yet. The second part, in which he interviews with candour and rougish humour, even relish, his diagnosed bi-polar friend was hugely powerful, and very economical.

Come here and say that.

Come here and say that.

More boxing – good! – later Friday evening, when after the Awards, my companion and I caught the late night screening of James Toback’s “Tyson”. http://tinyurl.com/6p9br5. Iron Mike himself exec produced (paid for?) this filmically innovative and hard hitting in both senses bio-piece of the disgraced, never forgotten ex World Champion. Amazingly frank about his own shortcomings, and proudly vitriolic to those who profited from both his rise and fall, it is thrilling and desperately sad.

For many Doc/Fest delegates, it’s the sessions that are the thing, and I, for one, love going back to school. I caught the third of four of DFG’s Newcomers’ Day sessions, a revealing series of non-traditional broadcasting case studies. Time and time again panelists referred to Lord Lance Weiler’s Workbook Project and Liz Rosenthal’s Power to the Pixel. Whilst I’m plugging: I hope you’ve bookmarked this very bulletin’s editor Ingrid Koop’s Tools Blog - http://shootingpeople.org/tools. - and downloaded our Short Sighted Handbook - http://shootingpeople.org/shortsighted.

But the most satisfying notebooks-out-boys-and-girls two hours was easily our friends at BRITDOC’s Saturday Service. http://tinyurl.com/britdoc. BRITDOC had caused the first big stir of the Festival, with their announcement that they won’t be returning to Keble, and will instead take their slate of live, Festival programming on the road, including a deep strategic partnership with Doc/Fest. Meantime, they’ve relaunched their website - http://britdoc.org. - and this event was a tour of their new raft of services they are offering to broker relationships between filmmakers and the Third Sector (charities, NGOs and the like). Their Real Good matchmaking website for that burgeoning space will be launched in January. Now is a very good time for you to start thinking about the kind of ‘Good’ films you’d like to make, because that industry is going to heat up palpably from now on. Bookmark this: http://britdoc.org/real_good.

So: I seem to have developed a specialty for interviewing the first timer. Elizabeth Marcus was a die hard Manic Street Preachers fan rather than filmmaker, when her husband and editor Yes You Can’d her into approaching the band. http://tinyurl.com/5kxg64. James Bradfield, Nicky Wire and Sean Moore were most forthcoming. Indeed, and not being that much of a Manics fan, I now find myself harbouring a huge affection for them, thanks to Marcus’s film: my favourite scene was Bradfield cooking a fry up for the crew. The film’s mix of kitchen sink star footage, painstakingly juxtaposed heartfelt and quirky fan vox pops, and detailed coverage of the band putting down a new single, tries to do pretty much everything, and succeeds most of the time. There will be plenty of time to redress that which doesn’t work: this was a work in progress, and the Manics fan soaked audience were delighted to offer their insights. Yes, and the elephant in the film, as it were – Richey Edwards’s disappearance – was deftly, persistently and unobtrusively dealt with.

And to last duties: Sunday’s secret film (announced Saturday!) was that consummate British documentary individualist Brian Hill’s (no debutant, touché) newest– the first audience screening, no less – of “Climate of Change”. Participant Media’s (“An Inconvenient Truth”, “Fast Food Nation”)’ commission essays micro climate activism: Indian schoolchildren motivating each other, an Appalachian citizen’s lone stand against coal mountain ‘beheading’, Papua New Guinean subsistence farmers refusing to log without sustainability, and a London Green PR exec. Stitching these disparate stories is some very Hill high art scoring, thanks to Nitin Sawhney, and plenty of long time collaborator Simon Armitage’s direct and moody verse, langorously recited by Tilda Swinton. In the QA&A, Hill said he had no intention of making climate pornography, and, indeed, the film is successful in it Obama-esqe aim: “yes we can! (Recycle)”.

So much went on that I didn’t see. Yet I certainly don’t recall sleeping much.

Michael Winterbottom goes to Genova

October 26th, 2008 by Cath Le Couteur

Another barrage of wonderful films from the LFF… and sadly only three days to go.

And yet more fantastic British suprises. Any new film that comes out by Michael Winterbottom (yes, he has made 15 films in 12 years.. he really has..) will always be of great interest.

And his latest GENOVA is possibly his most intimate yet. I really liked it. The premise sounds pretty straight - following the death of his wife in a car accident, university prof Joe (Colin Firth – not a personal favourite – great in this) decides to move with his two daughters Kelly (Willa Holland) and Mary (Perla Haney-Jardine) to the Italian town of Genova in an attempt to help his family deal with their grief… One of the daughters (Mary) blames herself for the mothers death, then starts to see visions of her mother as a ghost.

Michael Winterbottoms Genova with Colin Firth

Genova (dir: Michael Winterbottom)

It’s Winterbottom’s approach that makes the film feel absorbing and fresh. Rather than go for obvious cinema-esque plot points (terrible troubles moving to a new home? breakdown of the father? hysterics of the kids? dramatic speeches? terrible problems in starting a new life?) Winterbottom instead goes for something much more nuanced and discreet.

He shows his characters dealing with loss in very unfussy, down-to-earth, quietly sad ways. But combines this with ‘Don’t Look Now’ spooky odd angles and undercurrents. The result is very affecting – all adding up to a greater sense of isolation and grief, affecting them each in very different ways.

Colin Firth, Catherine Keener and Michael Winterbottom

Colin Firth, Catherine Keener and Michael Winterbottom

Look out for Catherine Keener (a personal favourite) who plays an old flame of Firths, and if you ever want to cast a young girl – both these actresses were tre-mendous.

As can be expected – Winterbottom has already announced plans to shoot ‘Murder in Samarkand’, based on the memoirs of a former British ambassador - AND - has already begun work on a project that will not be released until 2012. Seven Days stars John Simm as a man imprisoned for drug-smuggling and charts his relationship with his wife, played by Shirley Henderson. The film is being shot a few weeks at a time, over the next five years, to reflect the character’s time in prison.

Impressive or what.

Cath
SP

Hunger by Steve McQueen - astonishing

October 21st, 2008 by Cath Le Couteur

Is it just me or is the LFF this year one of its strongest ever?

I’ve just watched debut film ‘Hunger’ by (Turner prize winnning artist) Steve McQueen about the IRA hunger strike. I’m also an Australian. And despite knowing very little about critical events that took place between the IRA and British government, it is one of the most powerful and daring films I have seen for a very long time.

It also feels like the film has been made by an artist and not necessarily a filmmaker. And for that reason alone, it’s inspirational to see how McQueen choses to tell the story of IRA member Bobby Sands and his 1981 hunger strike. The film basically follows the events in Northern Ireland’s maze prison in the six weeks prior to Sands’ death, including his rapid deterioration.

It is just an extraordinary film. Told with such quiet and unassuming innovation - it’s brutal, it’s chilling and it’s disquieteningly brilliant.

The Hunger, winner Camera D'Or Cannes

The Hunger, winner Camera D'Or Cannes

The performance by Michael Fassbender - in fact all of the actors - are also worth highlighting. In a press conference in NY, McQueen said his method of working with the actors was “just a case of conversation” and “getting our minds back to the early ’80s.”

I’ve enclosed his thoughts here as a final note, because I think it tells you a lot about McQueen’s approach overall.

“I go back to smell,” he said. “I always associate the early ’80s with a certain kind of smell - like a British Sunday. Where everything was closed and it was miserable. It was awful. And I had that kind of idea of the early ’80s… So going back to that time with the actors, discussing, talking and actually rehearsing - rehearsing, rehearsing… It wasn’t a case of acting. It was a case of ‘being.’ And that is what I wanted. I wanted the actor to almost be like a sphere which you roll ‘this way’ or ‘that way’ and wherever you roll it, it’s perfect… And with actors I get the impression that some directors aren’t necessarily honest with them. For me, it was a case of if you’re honest with them, they go as far as you and try to go further.”

There is not really much more I want to say on this one, other than go see it as soon as it comes out.

Cath

Teachers, God and Larry Charles

October 19th, 2008 by Cath Le Couteur

It’s nice having a film-fest take place in your home town. I sat next to Lee in the cinema on Saturday night, caught up with the Brit Doc crew and their fans out in force to support the delightful Larry Charles and ‘Religulous’, then bumped into shooter patron Mike Figgis and friends at Bar Italia in the evening hours following his film and LFF workshop.

First things first. The buzz around Palme D’Or Winner ‘The Class’ is more than justified and treats that mawkish genre of ‘Inspirational Teacher’ with such subtlety, nuance and total class, you wish it was longer.

[The Class]

The Class, winner Palme D'or

The Class, winner Palme D

The film is based on a book by Begaudeau – a teacher who recorded his own experiences with high school students in France. With Director Laurent Cantet, he and a bunch of non-actor students, mapped out a fictional story together over months of workshops. The final film (shot on HD with three cameras, observational style) tells the story of a schoolteacher (actually played by Bergaudeau as a fictionalised version of himself) who makes a mistake while working in east Paris as a french teacher.

Damn it’s good.

And it’s good because it really captures the complexity of teacher/student relations in contemporary times without ever preaching, without ever feeling compelled to dictate a ‘truth’, without ever trying to reduce the myriad of questions it raises to any simple answers.

And I think it succeeds in this because it uses both fiction and documentary conventions, but never adheres to either. On one level it feels more like a fly-on-the-wall documentary rather than a fiction film, but as a fictional narrative (woven from many different threads of real life) it feels much more true to life than any strict documentary could.
Definitely a must-see.

Thankyou Jess for spiriting away the wonderful Larry Charles (writer/director of Borat, Seinfield, Curb Your Enthusiasm and very engaging, smart man) for drinks saturday eve after the screening of his latest feature ‘Religulous’. Constructed – in Larry’s words - as a ‘Saturday Night date movie’ the doc follows the exasperated, agnostic comedian Bill Maher around the US, taking the piss about all things faith-based. The sold-out crowd at the LFF belly-laughed and hooted all the way through.

RELIGULOUS, Larry Charles talking to Bill Maher

RELIGULOUS, Larry Charles talking to Bill Maher

Religulous Poster

Religulous Poster

It’s not a probing doc, but that’s not its intention. Neither are Maher and Charles trying to convince people to give up their faiths. They just have a load of devil-may-care, sometimes easy, relentless fun with how ridiculous it can be. And it does solemnly feel good to spend a Saturday night laughing out loud. I did find the ending strangely serious given the spirit of the film overall. But perhaps when you consider the results of 8years of ‘faith-based’ US foreign policy (acknowledged as such by Bush himself in the film), or consider that Roe vs Wade may be overturned by the religious views of a potential 2008 Presedential ticket.. well… hmmm… perhaps its not really just a barrel of laughs afterall. Kudos to Lee for the best audience joke of the night ‘Why didn’t Maher meet with the Buddhists – they’re the real bastards…’

The Wonderful World of Charlie Kauffman

October 17th, 2008 by Cath Le Couteur

I feel very very bad that I can never remember the names of screenwriters. I personally think writers should share the same size font and glory as directors. Then again probably so should editors, cinematographers, sound designers etc.

Anyway. I feel bad about this. But like most people - I am very aware of Charlie Kauffman - ‘The Writer’. And like most writer/directors, I am in awe of his abilities. And like most in the audience at the LFF, I was pretty chuffed about going in to see SYNEDOCHE NEW YORK - Kauffmans first written/directed project.

Synecdoche, New York

'Synecdoche, New York' by Charlie Kauffman

Man - it’s NUTS.

And gosh it starts well.

I can’t begin to tell you what happens in plot terms. I really don’t know. But thematically it’s about death, loneliness and losing your way and in places it’s unwaveringly tragic. Thing is, I genuinely did get completely lost half way through myself and I’m not sure that was part of Kauffmans intention, although I guess it could have been.. Only Kauffman would perhaps have the audacity to make it so.

Phillip Seymour Hoffman plays a tragic theatre director who’s life is slipping by, but who decides to embark on a massive theatre piece - set in a huge warehouse - that then begins to mirror his own real life. As he becomes consumed by his own work/life/ and the characters ‘playing him’ so too does the film become a mad simulacrum of art imiatating life and life imitating art and life and life and art and sadness and strange things all in between.

It reminded me (a tiny bit) of Tarantino’s From Dust til Dawn - a film that starts so brilliantly (original, character-driven road movie with a family in a campervan who get overun by eccentric fugitives) and then completely flips after 40-50minutes (into a vampire flick?? WHY??).

In Synedoche, it’s not really the same at all. It’s just that you wish he didn’t go quite so far with the simulacrum metaphor and lose you into what feels like another, in fact several other films and stories all in one go. Although it did make me wonder a little about the limits of film again. Perhaps Kauffman could have done better to put this into a novel aka Cloud Atlas.

But I do want to say this:
Go See It!

His audacity and ambition is worth it.
His imagination period is worth it.

There are moments of exquisite tragedy/comedy that are the product of truly brilliant writing. And there are flights of the imagination that just make you fall completely in love with cinema. Sam Morton for eg (who is BRILLIANT in this) buys a house that is literally on fire and it stays that way all the way through. It doesn’t feel gimmicky, it feels true to her character. It’s absurd and unexplained and yet it feels meaningful. That life is absurd and unexplained and all we can do is try to cope with whatever is thrown at us…

with Samantha Morton

'Synecdoche, New York ' with Samantha Morton

Like many of Kauffman’s films - the ongoing development and end of his films feel like they cause him a lot of grief. That it’s unfair that he has to finish. That its impossible to finish. And that all he can do is turn everything inside out and back over again until he’s either back at the beginning or at the end of the start. Unfortunately as an audience, or at least for me, it was just too difficult to stay connected with the characters and therefore connect with the piece overall. But I’ll be lining up in advance to see the next one.

Cath

Frost / Nixon - BFI London

October 15th, 2008 by Cath Le Couteur

Last night was the gala opening of Frost/Nixon (screenplay by Peter Morgan, directed by Ron Howard).

I liked it. I did like it. But I didn’t love it. I should also hold up my hands and say I am a bit of a politico. I read the Huffington Post quite regularly, my friends will contest to how much of a West-Wing nut I am, and I’m (somewhat morbidly and obsessively) fascinated by the upcoming US election. This should have rocked my boat.

Frost/Nixon dramatises the David Frost interview with Nixon in 1977 - an interview of all interviews. The key premise centers around whether Frost will get Nixon to apologise for his role in Watergate over several days of talks. And underneath this, the world of the film is structured as a prize fight between two nakedly ambitious men, both experiencing a professional crisis.

But somehow, despite really great performances, solid direction and a thriller-esque screenplay, I found myself restlessly wondering why the film wasn’t holding my attention. And it made me think a lot about cinematic form, particularly when trying to dramatise true events.

I think the film lost it’s way for me because all I had to hold onto (for the entire film) was a ‘will he or won’t he’ (i obviously knew Nixon eventually cracks), which then became a ‘how and how will he’. And the how wasn’t particularly fascinating either. Frost pushes the point and Nixon caves. Dramatically it just wasn’t enough.

The most interesting aspect of the film for me was when it started to explore the awareness Frost had in the 70’s of how the very medium/form of tv, and the power of the closeup, could unravel Nixon’s mastery of spin. And it’s here that I think theatre (and the theatre version) had more to offer.

Presented in theatre as a simple two-hander interview, with a massive screen behind that illuminated Nixon’s face (representing the tv closeup), it just had more power. Nixon on stage looks like a normal guy trying to cleverly spin his way out of trouble, like an every-day talk show. Nixon in closeup on the massive screen behind the stage, looks like a monster. The result is weirdly unnerving and very compelling.

The film version by contrast levelled everything out. As a straight, narrative depiction of events, it definitely works, but it just didn’t seem to do more than what it said on the tin.

Frost/Nixon - the theatre version

Frost/Nixon - the theatre version

Frost/Nixon - the film

Frost/Nixon - the film

As a small aside - Peter Morgan, screenplay maestro, is without a doubt the master of the telepone call. If you ever want to understand how to better use the often bland device of a phone call with real dramatic effect in a script - The Queen and Frost/Nixon are brilliant egs.

COMING UP
Some possible highlights for today THURS, OCT 16 –
http://www.bfi.org.uk/lff/

# Primary Animation Shorts 10:00 NFT2
A programme of short films plus a discussion about colour and music on film.

# Love Live Long 15:30 ODEON WEST END 2
Mike Figgis’ latest digital experiment, a study of desire and moral boundaries set against the backdrop of the Gumball 300 Rally.

# Three Blind Mice 18:30 ODEON WEST END 1
Three Australian sailors spend an eventful night on the town in Sydney.